The Dark Crystal (1982)

Directed by Jim Henson and Frank Oz. Jim Henson, Kathryn Mullen, Frank Oz, Dave Goelz, Steve Whitmire. Universal.

Decent Films Ratings

Overall
Recommendability
?C
Artistic/
Entertainment Value
?
Moral/Spiritual
Value (+4/-4)
? -2
Age
Appropriateness
?Teens & Up*

External Ratings

MPAA ?PG USCCB ?A-I

Content advisory: Some mildly scary menace and imagery; vaguely dualistic implications.

From a National Catholic Register review

By Steven D. Greydanus

Set in a mythic world populated entirely by fictional races from Jim Henson’s Muppet workshop, The Dark Crystal is ambitious high fantasy with Tolkienesque aspirations and a vague George Lucas vibe that’s part Star Wars mysticism, part Willow blandness. (Curiously, Lucas had nothing to do with The Dark Crystal, though he did executive produce that other 1980s fantasy family film with a Muppety cast, Labyrinth.)

The Dark Crystal opens in a world blighted and in darkness ever since the mighty “Crystal of Truth” shattered a millennium earlier and a tiny shard was lost. Now the cruel, vulture-like “Skeksis” reign while the gentle, camel-faced “Mystics” live in exile.

Among the Mystics lives a young, elf-like “Gelfling” named Jen, a survivor of Skeksis persecution. When his Mystic master dies (with a Jedi-esque fadeout), Jen is sent on a quest to “heal” the the Crystal of Truth, now the Dark Crystal, and thus the world. Pursued by the monstrous beetle-like Garthim, agents of the Skeksis, Jen sets out to find the missing shard of the crystal and reunite it with the whole.

Imaginatively ambitious and often visually engaging, The Dark Crystal resolutely remains a distant, uninvolving experience. The filmmakers’ attention seems occupied by the technical challenges of bringing this fictional world to life; characters and emotions, even by the archetypal standards of high fantasy, never come to life, and the overarching mythology seems too self-consciously contrived rather than taking on a mythic reality of its own.

Jen is a placeholder in the hero role, the Skeksis political intrigues have nothing hanging on them, and the Mystics spend the film walking really slowly toward the final confrontation. One Skeksis wanders through the film voicing a suggestive high-pitched interjection that sounds like he’s thinking something more intriguing than anything that ever actually materializes onscreen.

Before long it becomes clear that the Mystics and Skeksis are linked somehow. Their small numbers parallel one another, and the Skeksis emperor dies at the same time as the Mystic who was the master of Jen. Later we see that to wound or kill a member of either species is to inflict the same injury on his opposite number. This theme builds to an overtly monistic finale in which good does not triumph over evil, but is instead merged with it in a sort of yin-yang balance of harmony.

It’s meant to seem transcendent, I guess, but it comes off kind of ho-hum. Perhaps destroying the One Ring and the power of Mordor, or even blowing up the Death Star and sending Darth Vader careening out into space, makes for more satisfying drama and mythopoeia than just smooshing Obi-Wan the Grey and Darth Saruman and all their ilk into a bunch of big glowy Spielberg aliens on their way back home, leaving Frodo Skywalker behind to do who knows what with the world he’s redeemed. Either way, The Dark Crystal comes off more like a film about the idea of an epic mythic fantasy than a persuasive example of the thing itself.

Related Content

Mail: Re: The Dark Crystal, Labyrinth

I admit I’m completely baffled. I understand why you didn’t think much of The Dark Crystal and Labyrinth, but I have no idea why you troubled yourself to review them. I did see The Dark Crystal and thought your review was actually kinder than it deserved. I admit I never saw Labyrinth, but no one whose opinion I respected ever suggested that I should.

I understand perfectly why you would review an older movie that audiences should take the time to find and see, but these two movies don’t seem to qualify. Of course it is your perfect right to review whatever movies you see fit, but I was greatly surprised that you saw fit to review those two and am genuinely curious as to why.

Many factors go into what movies wind up getting reviewed and what movies don’t. In the case of The Dark Crystal and Labyrinth, the precipitating factor was new DVD editions for both films, making them candidates for my weekly “DVD Picks” column in the National Catholic Register — and, being family-themed films that still have a significant nostalgic appeal for many viewers, they are of some interest to my readership.

The Dark Crystal in particular continues to have admirers, though I’m not especially one of them. Labyrinth also has devoted fans — a number of whom have written to take exception with my review. In general, though, readers seem generally to agree more than not on these reviews.

Link to this entry

Review: Labyrinth (1986)

C | **½ | -1| Kids & Up*

Despite some imaginative visuals, such as the Escher-inspired omnidirectional castle at the finale, Labyrinth suffers from a distinct lack of charm, with poorly thought-out characters, limp plotting and a limp climax. Although positioned as a coming-of-age tale, Labyrinth indulges rather than challenges Sarah’s heroic-princess fantasies, with a made-to-order adversary whose whole world, for no very obvious reason, seems to revolve around Sarah.

Continue reading this review >

Decent Films Guide - Film appreciation and criticism informed by Christian faith - Celebrating 10 years

Coming Soon

Recently Added

In Theaters – Latest

In Theaters – All